Seleucid–Mauryan war

Seleucid–Mauryan War

Alexander the Great's Satrapies in Northern India.
Date305–303 BC
Northwestern India; Chiefly the Indus River Valley

Decisive Mauryan victory[1][note 1]

  • Treaty of the Indus[4]
  • Seleucid Empire's eastern satrapies ceded to Mauryan Empire
  • Daughters of Seleucus I given hand in marriage to Changragupta and his generals
  • Chandragupta gives 500 war elephants to Seleucus
  • Marriage alliance and establishment of diplomatic relations
Maurya Empire Seleucid Empire
Commanders and leaders
Chandragupta Maurya
Seleucus I Nicator
100,000 infantry
30,000 cavalry
9,000 elephants[citation needed]
250,000 infantry[citation needed]
Casualties and losses
unknown unknown

The Seleucid–Mauryan War was fought between 305 and 303 BCE. It started when Seleucus I Nicator, of the Seleucid Empire, sought to retake the Indian satrapies of the Macedonian Empire which had been occupied by Emperor Chandragupta Maurya, of the Maurya Empire.

The war ended in a settlement resulting in the annexation the Indus Valley region and part of Afghanistan to the Mauryan Empire, with Chandragupta securing control over the areas that he had sought, and a marriage alliance between the two powers. After the war, the Mauryan Empire emerged as the dominant power of the Indian Subcontinent, and the Seleucid Empire turned its attention toward defeating its rivals in the west.



Chandragupta Maurya established himself as ruler of Magadha around 321 BCE. He decided to conquer the Nanda Dynasty, rulers at the time of the Gangetic Plain. He fought the empire for eleven years with successful guerrilla campaigns, and captured the Nanda capital of Pataliputra. This led to the fall of the empire and the eventual creation of the Maurya Empire under Emperor Chandragupta Maurya.

The Persian provinces in what is now modern Afghanistan, together with the wealthy kingdom of Gandhara and the states of the Indus Valley, had all submitted to Alexander the Great and become part of his empire. When Alexander died, the Wars of the Diadochi ("Successors") split his empire apart; as his generals fought for control of Alexander's empire. In the eastern territories one of these generals, Seleucus I Nicator, was taking control and was starting to establish what became known as the Seleucid Empire. According to the Roman historian Appian, Seleucus,

always lying in wait for the neighboring nations, strong in arms and persuasive in council, he acquired Mesopotamia, Armenia, 'Seleucid' Cappadocia, Persis, Parthia, Bactria, Arabia, Tapouria, Sogdia, Arachosia, Hyrcania, and other adjacent peoples that had been subdued by Alexander, as far as the river Indus, so that the boundaries of his empire were the most extensive in Asia after that of Alexander. The whole region from Phrygia to the Indus was subject to Seleucus.

— Appian, History of Rome, The Syrian Wars 55

Alexander had appointed satraps in control of his territories. Similarly satraps were appointed to govern the Indus Valley. The Mauryans had annexed the areas governed by four such satraps: Nicanor, Phillip, Eudamus and Peithon. This established Mauryan control to the banks of the Indus. Chandragupta's victories convinced Seleucus that he needed to secure his eastern flank. Seeking to hold the Macedonian territories there, Seleucus thus came into conflict with the emerging and expanding Mauryan Empire over the Indus Valley.[5]


Details of the conflict are lacking. Per Appian,

Seleucus crossed the Indus and waged war with Sandrocottus [Maurya], king of the Indians, who dwelt on the banks of that stream, until they came to an understanding with each other and contracted a marriage relationship. Some of these exploits were performed before the death of Antigonus and some afterward.

— Appian, History of Rome, The Syrian Wars 55

It is unknown if there was in fact a pitched battle.[4] Military historian John D. Grainger has argued that Seleucus, upon crossing the Indus, "would find himself in a trap, with a large river at his back and a hostile continent before him," and consequently could not have advanced much farther than the Indus. According to Grainger, the details of the conflict are unclear, but the outcome clearly must have been "a decisive Indian victory," with Chandragupta driving back Seleucus' forces as far as the Hindu Kush and consequently gaining large territories in modern-day Afghanistan.[6] According to Wheatley and Heckel, the level of friendly Maurya-Seleucid relations established after the war imply that the hostilities were probably "neither prolonged nor grievous".[3]


Chandragupta and Seleucus made a peace settlement in 304 BCE. Selecucus Nucator ceded the satrapies of Paropamisadae, Aria, Arachosia, Gandhara and Gedrosia. In return, Chandragupta Maurya gifted Seleucid with 500 war elephants, which subsequently influenced the Wars of the Diadochi. With the war elephants acquired from the Mauryas, Seleucus was able to defeat his rival, Antigonus at the Battle of Ipsus. The results of this conflict however favored the Mauryan Empire as Chandragupta fielded a significant army of elephants (9,000 elephants) in comparison to the contingent he parted with. Additionally Chandragupta's gift of war elephants "may have alleviated the burden of fodder and the return march"[5] and allowed him to appropriately reduce the size and cost of his large army, since the major threats to his power had now all been removed.[7] Mauryan control of territory in Afghanistan helped guard against invasion of India from the northwest.[8] Chandragupta Maurya went on to expand his rule in India southward into the Deccan.[9]

The alliance was solidified with a marriage between Chandragupta Maurya and a princess of the Seleucid Empire. The outcome of the arrangement proved to be mutually beneficial.[10] The border between the Seleucid and Mauryan Empires remained stable in subsequent generations, and friendly diplomatic relations are reflected by the ambassador Megasthenes, and by the envoys sent westward by Chandragupta's grandson Ashoka.


  1. ^ Hartmut Scharfe (1971) had argued that Seleucus had gained the upper hand and retained overlordship of the eastern satrapies, which were put under Chandragupta's charge in exchange for the elephants as tribute; but according to Trautmann[2], no other scholars have agreed with this conclusion; Wheatley and Heckel state that Scharfe's argument "does not convince."[3]


  1. ^ Grainger 2014, p. 108–109: "Such fighting as there was produced a decisive Indian victory. [...] There is little or no evidence for the [detailed] account [...] The career of Chandragupta is as unclear as that of Seleukos in the east."
  2. ^ Trautmann 2015, p. 235.
  3. ^ a b Wheatley and Heckel 2011, p. 296.
  4. ^ a b Kosmin 2014, p. 33.
  5. ^ a b Kosmin 2014, p. 34.
  6. ^ Grainger 2014, p. 108–109
  7. ^ Grainger 2014, p. 110.
  8. ^ Grainger 2014, p. 108,110.
  9. ^ [R.G. Grant: Commanders pg. 49]
  10. ^ Kosmin 2014, p. 33–34.


Categories: Wars involving India | Wars involving ancient India | Wars involving the Seleucid Empire | 300s BC conflicts | Maurya Empire | Foreign relations of ancient India

Information as of: 10.06.2020 12:13:11 CEST

Source: Wikipedia (Authors [History])    License : CC-BY-SA-3.0

Changes: All pictures and most design elements which are related to those, were removed. Some Icons were replaced by FontAwesome-Icons. Some templates were removed (like “article needs expansion) or assigned (like “hatnotes”). CSS classes were either removed or harmonized.
Wikipedia specific links which do not lead to an article or category (like “Redlinks”, “links to the edit page”, “links to portals”) were removed. Every external link has an additional FontAwesome-Icon. Beside some small changes of design, media-container, maps, navigation-boxes, spoken versions and Geo-microformats were removed.

Please note: Because the given content is automatically taken from Wikipedia at the given point of time, a manual verification was and is not possible. Therefore does not guarantee the accuracy and actuality of the acquired content. If there is an Information which is wrong at the moment or has an inaccurate display please feel free to contact us: email.
See also: Legal Notice & Privacy policy.