Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums
Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums is a music chart published weekly by Billboard magazine that ranks R&B and hip hop albums based on sales in the United States and is compiled by Nielsen SoundScan. The chart debuted as Hot R&B LP's in the issue dated January 30, 1965, in an effort by the magazine to further expand into the field of rhythm and blues music. It then went through several name changes, being known as Soul LPs in the 1970s and Top Black Albums in the 1980s, before returning to the R&B identification in 1990 and affixing a hip hop designation in 1999 to reflect the latter's growing sales and relationship to R&B during the decade.
From 1965 through 2009, the chart was compiled based on reported sales at a core panel of stores with a "higher-than-average volume" of R&B and/or hip-hop album sales to monitor buying trends of the African-American community. This panel included more independent and smaller chain stores compared to the high percentage of mass merchants that account for overall album sales. The core panel of stores continued to be monitored with the advent of SoundScan technology in the early 1990s but was dissolved at the end of 2009 when the methodology of the chart changed to "recap overall album sales of current R&B/hip-hop titles."
- 1 Chart name history
- 2 Album achievements
- 3 References
- 4 External links
Chart name history
The chart debuted in 1965 as the Hot R&B LPs. In 1969, Billboard renamed both singles and albums contingents of the R&B charts as Soul charts. In 1978, they were renamed again as Hot Black Singles and Top Black Albums. In 1990, the charts returned to the R&B designation (Top R&B Albums, Hot R&B Singles). In 1999, Billboard renamed them again as Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums and Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Singles & Tracks, in an effort to recognize the growing sales of hip hop music and the genre's influential relationship to contemporary R&B.
Most weeks in top ten
|64||Whitney Houston||Whitney Houston|||
|63||The E.N.D.||The Black Eyed Peas|||
|59||The Heist||Macklemore and Ryan Lewis|||
|Can’t Slow Down||Lionel Richie|||
|54||24K Magic||Bruno Mars|||
Most weeks on chart
|179||2014 Forest Hills Drive||J. Cole|||
|175||Curtain Call: The Hits||Eminem|||
|146||good kid, m.A.A.d city||Kendrick Lamar|||
|145||Beauty Behind The Madness||The Weeknd|||
|140||The Eminem Show||Eminem|||
|140||Enter The Wu-Tang (36 Chambers)||Wu-Tang Clan|||
- ^ "Billboard's R&B Section" . Billboard. Vol. 77 no. 5. January 30, 1965. p. 14. Retrieved May 1, 2020.
- ^ "New Store Panel Updates R&B Charts" . Billboard. Vol. 116 no. 49. December 4, 2004. p. 16. Retrieved May 1, 2020.
- ^ Trust, Gary (November 17, 2009). "Billboard 200 Undergoes Makeover" . Billboard. Retrieved May 1, 2020.
- ^ "Billboard R&B Charts Get Updated Names" . Billboard. December 11, 1999. p. 8. Retrieved May 26, 2020 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Anderson, Trevor (September 8, 2018). "Post Malone's 'Stoney' Tops Michael Jackson's 'Thriller' for Most Weeks in Top 10 on Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums Chart" . Billboard. Retrieved September 8, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Anderson, Trevor (15 March 2019). "Drake's 'Take Care' Breaks Record for Most Weeks on Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums Chart" . Billboard. Retrieved 18 March 2019.
Information as of: 16.07.2020 05:13:59 CEST
Source: Wikipedia (Authors [History]) License : CC-by-sa-3.0
Changes: All pictures and most design elements which are related to those, were removed. Some Icons were replaced by FontAwesome-Icons. Some templates were removed (like “article needs expansion) or assigned (like “hatnotes”). CSS classes were either removed or harmonized.
Wikipedia specific links which do not lead to an article or category (like “Redlinks”, “links to the edit page”, “links to portals”) were removed. Every external link has an additional FontAwesome-Icon. Beside some small changes of design, media-container, maps, navigation-boxes, spoken versions and Geo-microformats were removed.
Please note: Because the given content is automatically taken from Wikipedia at the given point of time, a manual verification was and is not possible. Therefore LinkFang.org does not guarantee the accuracy and actuality of the acquired content. If there is an Information which is wrong at the moment or has an inaccurate display please feel free to contact us: email.